<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Cheap Canon Lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/</link>
	<description>Tech News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:28:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcfastlane.com/?p=1364#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>Addedum: Here are both the 70-210 and 24-85 attached to an EOS camera:

http://www.ipernity.com/doc/jthole/6323726
(feel free to use this picture if you want, as long as you respect the CC license)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addedum: Here are both the 70-210 and 24-85 attached to an EOS camera:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ipernity.com/doc/jthole/6323726" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipernity.com/doc/jthole/6323726</a><br />
(feel free to use this picture if you want, as long as you respect the CC license)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/comment-page-1/#comment-3321</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcfastlane.com/?p=1364#comment-3321</guid>
		<description>Good guide! Instead of the Phoenix 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5, I would recommend the Tokina 19-35. Much better build quality, and optically better as well. The Phoenix is a Vivitar design, while the Tokina is their own design, based on the old 20-35mm.

Another very good one (apart from the barrel distortion at the short end) is the Canon EF 24-85mm. The same optical design as the 70-210, and similar quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good guide! Instead of the Phoenix 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5, I would recommend the Tokina 19-35. Much better build quality, and optically better as well. The Phoenix is a Vivitar design, while the Tokina is their own design, based on the old 20-35mm.</p>
<p>Another very good one (apart from the barrel distortion at the short end) is the Canon EF 24-85mm. The same optical design as the 70-210, and similar quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/comment-page-1/#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcfastlane.com/?p=1364#comment-3258</guid>
		<description>The EF 28-135 IS USM is beyond the $200 limit, but the similar Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 USM can be bought for under 200.  It is a great lens, well built, USM, and inexpensive. Nice list though,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EF 28-135 IS USM is beyond the $200 limit, but the similar Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 USM can be bought for under 200.  It is a great lens, well built, USM, and inexpensive. Nice list though,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/comment-page-1/#comment-3253</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcfastlane.com/?p=1364#comment-3253</guid>
		<description>That is a really great lens I myself own. At a price of $400, however, it is far out of the range of this list. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a really great lens I myself own. At a price of $400, however, it is far out of the range of this list. <img src='http://www.pcfastlane.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/comment-page-1/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcfastlane.com/?p=1364#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>Surprised the Canon EF 28-135mm IS USM didn&#039;t make the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised the Canon EF 28-135mm IS USM didn&#8217;t make the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prosens</title>
		<link>http://www.pcfastlane.com/top-5-canon-lenses-under-200/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Prosens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcfastlane.com/?p=1364#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 - the best !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 &#8211; the best !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

